JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 16, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Mario Wilson Peña Rivera·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para asegurar el cumplimiento del fallo en asuntos de gran trascendencia social
Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia de Juez de Ejecución de Penas y Medidas de Seguridad en sentencia T-916/09
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
Juez De Primera Instancia
  • Competencia para conocer incidente de desacato y adoptar medidas a que haya lugar
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia por claridad en orden de suministrar medicamentos, colchón, pañales desechables y enfermería domiciliaria por el tiempo y condiciones que establezca el médico tratante en sentencia
5 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-916/09.

Se decide no asumir la petición, debido a que es el juzgado de primera instancia quien debe conocer del incidente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. NO ASUMIR la peticion de iniciar incidente de desacato, presentada por el senor Mario Wilson Pena Rivera.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado
  3. Segundo. de Ejecucion de Penas y Medidas de Seguridad de Santa Marta la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T-916 de 2009, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  4. Tercero. INFORMAR al solicitante esta decision, por intermedio de la Secretaria General de esta corporacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.